2 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen's avatar

I agree 110% with what you wrote. Furman can and should do better. I disagreed with about 80% of what Charlie said, but I would never go so far as to call him "polarizing." He made college kids think. I didn't see him as out to change hearts or minds. He just engaged and didn't flinch in his beliefs. There is a dearth of that these days. And patting herself on the back for having Alan Dershowitz on campus was unnecessarily gratuitous.

Expand full comment
Emanuela Prister's avatar

I picked on the same two points. And the “even” at the end, makes it sound like she is saying “he was polarizing but despite that we will continue engaging in free speech” when in fact he was a champion of free speech and he was killed because he was denounced by some as “polarizing”.

Expand full comment